G$earch

8 Pivotal Acquisitions Made By Google

Posted by Harshad

8 Pivotal Acquisitions Made By Google


8 Pivotal Acquisitions Made By Google

Posted: 19 Aug 2013 08:01 AM PDT

Google formerly known only for its search engine service decades ago, has turned into a flourishing multi-faceted Internet organization that provides services and products like video-sharing (YouTube), social networking (Google+), navigation (Maps) emailing (Gmail), web browser (Chrome), mobile OS (Android), etc.

Of course, all these would not have been possible without the more than a hundred acquisitions Google have been making for years, many of which have either been developed further independently, or integrated into their range of new products or services.

Although some acquisitions have resulted in discontinuation, Google had much to gain by absorbing the talents into their team, and as it turns out, a premium amount doesn’t necessarily equate to good turnouts. Motorola Mobility, was acquired with a whopping $12.5 billion, but does not seem to be leading nowhere.

In this post however we look at 8 pivotal acquisitions that made Google the powerhouse it is today and probably for years to come.

1) Applied Semantics

Acquired: April 23, 2003
Cost: $102 million

Formerly Oingo, Applied Semantics is the company with the semantic text processing technology that eventually facilitated the development of AdSense. Basically, Google AdSense is a unique program that allows publishers registered with the Google Network of content sites to place automatic text, image, video, or interactive media ads that are targeted to site content and audience.

How It Works

During the days before the acquisition, Applied Semantics established itself with its very own patented CIRCA technology (Conceptual Information Retrieval and Communication Architecture) which understands, organizes and extracts information from websites by providing more effective information retrieval.

Their AdSense product employs comprehensive search algorithms to understand the context and key themes of webpages by relating to the keywords.

After getting their hands on Applied Semantics’ CIRCA technology, not only was Google able to deliver highly relevant and targeted advertisements, its search engine has also been strengthened by their new-found ability to search for meanings and concepts instead of keywords.

Success!

As a result of this acquisition, Google was able to rise above Yahoo!, its direct competitor at that time and eventually became known not only for its superior search engine, but also for being one of the most important advertising company in the world.

As of the last fiscal quarter of 2012, Google announced that they have generated $3.44 billion in revenue from AdSense, accounting for a little more than a quarter of the company’s total revenue.

2) Picasa

Acquired: July 13, 2004
Cost: under $5 million

Another early acquisition by Google, Picasa was bought over for an undisclosed amount in what appears to be a plan to beef up the photo publishing feature on Google’s Blogger (acquired just a year earlier via Pyra Labs, creator of Blogger. Shortly after the acquisition, the online photo manager was made available as a free download, then retired in 2011 to be integrated into Google+.

What It Does

Today, not only does Picasa exists as a standalone photo management tool with basic photo-editing features, it also has its own Picasa Web Albums hosted on Google+. It has also become one of several favourite tools online for web-based photobugs, competing with the likes of Yahoo-owned Flickr (acquired by Yahoo! In 2005) as well as Photobucket. It also serves as a powerful backup tools for photos taken on your smartphone.

How It’s Doing So Far

Linking Picasa with Google+ was yet another smart move to sufficiently pit themselves against the strong culture of photo-sharing over at Flickr. By leveraging on their growing social network, Google is probably hoping that the ease of sharing photos offered by Picasa and the strong integration with Google+ would boost the membership on both sides.

3) Android

Acquired: August 16, 2005
Cost: $50 million

Acquiring Android Inc. was such a blessing for Google that David Lawee (head of Corporate Development department) called it the "best deal ever" in 2010. We probably feel the same today based on how well the open source software is doing in today’s smartphone market.

Android OS has become the top-selling smartphone platform today, totalling up to more than half (52.5%) of the smartphone market in 2011 and an overwhelming 75% by the first quarter of 2013.

What It Does

Check out our Evolution of Android OS for a brief look at its path of development. Tapping into the surging popularity and influence of the Android OS in the mobile market, Google was able to provide unparalleled exposure for its wide range of products and services.

Coupled that with its acquisition of the mobile-advertising startup AdMob (more on that later), the company ventured into the mobile ads business through the Android OS by profiteering from ads which appear on Android phones and tablets. Revenues generated from those mobile ads alone make up a significant portion of the $1 billion Google makes from their entire mobile ads business per year.

How It’s Doing So Far

With Android seemingly winning the mobile OS race against Apple and the growing Windows Phone, the future looks promising. Android is also moving beyond phones and tablets to become pioneers in uncharted territories. The OS is said to be integrated with their Google Glass.

4) YouTube

Acquired: October 9, 2006
Cost: $1.65 billion

Contrary to what many had expected, it was never integrated into the now-defunct Google Videos and only remained operating as a subsidiary of Google. YouTube at the time was merely a hosting site for user-generated videos and had no profits to speak of. The maintenance of over a billion clips on the site alone cost Google substantially. What then, could be the rationale behind such an expensive acquisition?

What It Does

Essentially speaking, the increasingly popular YouTube provided a good platform for Google to generate revenues from advertising. This was how those short 15 or 30-second ad clips at the beginning of popular YouTube videos came to be.

We as viewers can skip some of these in-stream ads after five seconds of playtime – which is an effective means of determining whether viewers are interested in the ads and products. As a result, this valuable feedback to ad sponsors allows Google to charge them premium rates and earn greater revenues.

How It’s Doing So Far

Today, YouTube is the biggest video sharing website across the globe and its revenue for this year is expected to hit $3.7 billion. Morgan Stanley even predicted that YouTube could hit $20 billion by the year 2020. $1.65 billion may be the third highest amount that Google ever spent on acquiring a successful start-up, but looking at the investment returns, the money is certainly well worth spending.  

5) DoubleClick

Acquired: April 14, 2007
Cost: $3.1 billion

DoubleClick cost Google more than $3 billion and we are not referring to the decimal difference. Despite being the second most expensive acquisition by Google (thus far), it was one of the more controversial acquisitions the giant has made. The transaction was subjected to an 8-month investigation by US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) over accusations of antitrust practices. The final verdict found "Google’s proposed acquisition of DoubleClick unlikely to substantially lessen competition".

What It Does

The deal was an attempt to merge DoubleClick’s flashier, interactive multimedia ads (or display advertising) with Google’s existing short text-link advertising that appear next to search results. Google wanted to target, serve and analyze online ads of all types, something of a forte with DoubleClick’s long banner-providing history.

However, DoubleClick was also often linked with controversial use of spyware to track user clicks and the acquisition seeded potential implications on privacy issues. People were uncomfortable with Google’s unprecedented access to (and storage of) data pertaining to website traffic, personal information, and their surfing habits.

How It’s Doing So Far

Google had announced on June 4 that a new HTML5 creative development tool known as the Web Designer will not only enable advertisers to create more dynamic web ads and content for free, it will also be seamlessly integrated with DoubleClick Studio and AdMob.

Similarly, Google will also be combining their recently acquired (July 31, 2012) Wildfire social media marketing platform with DoubleClick to provide marketers with a deeper level of engagement with their audience. Clearly, Google has big plans for DoubleClick because it has been doing wonders for its advertising department, particularly for display-advertising revenues.

6) AdMob

Acquired: November 9, 2009
Cost: $750 million

Similar to DoubleClick, the acquisition of AdMob was met with much opposition from FTC over allegations that the deal violates antitrust laws. Consequently, the acquisition took nearly as long as DoubleClick for its completion. Finally, on May 27, 2010, after FTC closed its investigations, the deal is sealed. Apple, who was outbid by Google, ended up purchasing AdMob’s competitor, Quattro Wireless for $275 million.

What It Does

Google noted that mobile advertising was a growing industry and wanted to be the one to develop it further and integrate it with their unmatched search platform. As an expert on mobile ad technologies, AdMob enabled Google to serve display ads to mobile devices, and to track and report the success and failure of mobile ad campaigns. But that’s not all.

Ian Schafer, the CEO of interactive engagement marketing agency Deep Focus, postulated that Google bought AdMob mainly for the usage data of the most popular apps, especially those from Apple’s App Store. Both iPhone and Android users contributed to Google’s 5x mobile search growth in the two years before the deal in 2009 – a quarter of these users spend nearly 90 minutes/day using apps on their devices.

Having access to AdMob and the data it carries gives Google the advantage because they have the data to how iPhone apps are used, the engagement rate of advertisements and user loyalty. That would definitely tip the scales.

How It’s Doing So Far

Taking into account the dual benefits of kick-starting the business of mobile display ads and having access to usage data for their competitor’s apps, the highly-acclaimed AdMob was undoubtedly a winning move for Google to get ahead in the game. Google is still developing AdMob today and even reinventing it with new tools.

7) Meebo

Acquired: June 4, 2012
Cost: $100 million

For $100 million, Google brought over Meebo’s expertise to spruce up their own social networking platform, Google+. A year after its acquisition, Meebo was discontinued, absorbed into the Google+ team, and lost its toolbar on June 6, 2013.

What It Does

Since 2005, Meebo had served as a browser-based instant messaging program that supports multiple IM services ranging from Windows Live Messenger to ICQ, to Google Talk and Facebook Chat. It then went on to also become a tool for web publishers that allows readers to share their posts via a pop-up at the bottom of each of their pages.

Meebo’s team had since been focusing their resources on initiatives like the Google+ Sign-In and other Google+ plug-ins like Badges, +1 recommendations and Share buttons.

In a similar vein, Google’s first attempt on May 15, 2013 to unify its many fragmented messaging clients (e.g. Google Talk, Google Voice, Google Chat, etc) through its very own Hangouts appears to be similar to what Meebo have been adopting and is especially adept at.

How It’s Doing So Far

The ink is still wet on the Google-Meebo deal, nevertheless, Google have been showing that they are making good use of Meebo’s specialized skills with messaging services for Google+ Sign-In and involving them with web publisher tools that promote user engagement.

Taking Meebo under its wings does looks like a sound decision with lots of potential development, and may prove to be a huge step forward for Google to effectively compete against Facebook and other Internet giants.

8) Waze

Acquired: June 11, 2013
Cost: $1.3 billion

Breaching the $1bil dollar mark, Waze is only the fourth costliest purchase by Google by far. The Israeli mapping service start-up, known for its award-winning navigational app with over 50 million users (or ‘Wazers’) worldwide.

What It Does

Waze incorporates elements of social and community engagement to produce reliable traffic updates and information on top of just location data, which Google Maps does already. Their unique approach of combining social networking with location-tracking and mapping services allowed crowdsourcing of real-time road conditions.

This includes information such as police speed traps, accidents and the resultant traffic jams, unforeseen (and unannounced) road closures etc. The wealth of social data and cultivated culture of strong user engagement within the Waze community has been a boost to Google’s world-mapping quest. This crucial social aspect may to be the gap which Google is seeking to fill through this acquisition.

How It’s Doing So Far

It’s too early to tell how Google will take Waze further than where they are now. However the Google-Waze deal will be under the close scrutiny of watchdogs such as the US FTC to make sure that there are no breach of antitrust laws, for fear that this acquisition might unfairly favour Google in achieving ultimate dominance in the online mapping business. I think they’re on to something.


    


[Giveaway] 5x Annual Memberships To Pixelkit Design Resources

Posted: 19 Aug 2013 06:01 AM PDT

We’re back with a new giveaway and like always, you don’t want to miss out on what we have up for offers. If you are a designer looking for fresh and premium graphic resources for your next design project, stop reading and just join the contest with the widget below right now!

The Prizes

Still reading? All right. We are looking to give away Annual Memberships to Pixelkit, home to thousands of GUI Kits, icon packs, mobile app interfaces and premium graphics. Click here to find out more.

And the good news is their resources are renewed and replenished on a monthly basis, so you will want to revisit it once in a while.

We’re looking to give you access to all this by giving you, our beloved hongkiat.com readers, free annual memberships to Pixelkit worth $39 to 5 lucky winners. Keep your designs up to date and trendy with this massive resource pile.

How To Win

Using the Rafflecopter widget below, or click here.

  1. Login via your Facebook account / Email Address.
  2. Like Us on Facebook (if you aren’t already a fan)

Find out how else you can earn entries (and a higher chance of winning) in the widget. [More info]

a Rafflecopter giveaway


    


How Guest Posts May Derail Your Google Ranking

Posted: 19 Aug 2013 03:01 AM PDT

If you own a blog or website that depend on content and Google’s Panda, then you know the power this algorithm has on the way we do business online. Many unsuspecting site owners don’t realize that they are losing ranking in search engines (or even their right to rank at all) thanks to underhanded tactics used by some freelance writers.

Many sites receive guest posts from bloggers – new and established – to help bring in content as well as affiiation with other groups by name and by links. If you are new to this subject and are taking guest posts from just about every Tom, Dick, Sally and Mary you find online, you need to know better.

Look into filtering out posts that will not help take your site higher and beware of the crooked content writer who is here to forward his or her own agenda over yours. From keywod stuffing to third-party comments and Wikipedia links, here are the things you should take note of as the captain of your ship.

Stuffing is for Turkeys

Beware of freelance writers who stuff content with keywords. These are content writers who have never evolved. Even though search engine results depend on keywords, keywords are fine when used in moderation. Using too many keywords, however, will cause Google to pass you up in the search engine rankings and can even get you barred. Aim for lower saturation and better placement of keywords.

Plagiarism and Duplicate Content

If you are a webmaster that is taking the freelance writer’s word that their content is original, you are making a big mistake. There are freelance writers who check their content before they submit it to you. There are even freelance content writers with a style so unique that they do not have to check.

Even if this is the case, you should always test content. Even honest freelancers with years of experience can accidentally duplicate material. ‘Dirty’ freelancers that steal content can get your website barred from Google rankings. There are freelancers that will copy the whole post, change a few key words or phrases to try and fool CopyScape. But they can’t fool Google.

And yet, you pay the price, not they. Why trust someone you have never met with your livelihood? Always check content with a good content copy checker application. Try Copyscape or DupeFreePro (which also helps with keyword saturation problems).

Costly Comments

If you hire a freelance writer who has an unusually high comment rate right out of the gate, one of two things is taking place. A) You have a winner with a style people relate to and content people either love or hate (either is okay if it generate comments).

B) You have a freelance writer that is paying a service to comment. This is one of the worst things that you can have associated with your honest website or blog. Google frowns upon this kind of activity and regardless of your ignorance, you are responsible, not the freelancer who will deny and disappear.

What To Do:

One way to spot this activity is to back track links left in comments. The websites that supply them cannot resist adding links to the same sponsors over and over. Watch for redundant names, phrases, and zero negative comments as well.

If you find this activity on your blog or website, drop the writer like a hot rock and remove all posts and comments related to them. Find an honest writer to rewrite the posts in their own words if they are important to your site.

The Link Sneak

If you are paying for content, only allow the writer personal links in his or her bio. If they request or just add links to websites in the content, they are probably being paid to do so.

If you find this kind of behavior from a freelance writer who does it without your knowledge… take offense, even if the link leads to a high-ranking website with good domain authority. It is the dishonesty that counts. The next link could be the one that sinks you. Always check links whether they relate to the content or not.

Good Links

A fact checking link is fine if it actually backs up a statement or theory forwarded by a freelance writer, but be sure that is all it is. Anything else may be trouble. (Encourage your freelancer to link to internal pages of your blog and website when applicable.)

Wikipedia Links

Wikipedia is not a great place to back up content. It is a public website that accepts its content from freelancers, experts in their fields, or anyone who can follow their guidelines. This does not make every article accurate or automatically credible. Be wary of the freelance content writer who is always depending upon Wikipedia for confirmation of a fact. They should know better.

You are Responsible

Always check links to see where they go and to whom writers are attaching your blog or website. A link to the wrong place can also ruin your rank and domain authority. As the site owner, it is your responsibility to ensure that your content writer is not doing anything dishonest or that could get your website or blog barred from the search engines entirely. While this may seem challenging, it is worth it.

Alternatively you can get a good editor who will normally do most of these things for you. Protect yourself from bad content writers, particularly those who come with their own agenda and you will succeed.


    


0 comments:

Post a Comment