User Rating:
Good: The G-Project G-Go is portable wireless Bluetooth speaker that's water-resistant and has a unique design that's highlighted by an integrated carrying handle. The unit can be powered by four AA batteries for up to around 8 hours. There's also a built-in USB port for charging other portable devices such as a smartphone.
Bad: There isn't a rechargeable battery, and sound is only OK.
Bottom Line: Its sound may not be impressive, but the G-Go's unique design, affordable price, and splash resistance make it appealing for casual listening. [Read more]

User Rating:
Good: The G-Project G-Go is portable wireless Bluetooth speaker that's water-resistant and has a unique design that's highlighted by an integrated carrying handle. The unit can be powered by four AA batteries for up to around 8 hours. There's also a built-in USB port for charging other portable devices such as a smartphone.
Bad: There isn't a rechargeable battery, and sound is only OK.
Bottom Line: Its sound may not be impressive, but the G-Go's unique design, affordable price, and splash resistance make it appealing for casual listening. [Read more]

User Rating:
Good: The G-Project G-Go is portable wireless Bluetooth speaker that's water-resistant and has a unique design that's highlighted by an integrated carrying handle. The unit can be powered by four AA batteries for up to around 8 hours. There's also a built-in USB port for charging other portable devices such as a smartphone.
Bad: There isn't a rechargeable battery, and sound is only OK.
Bottom Line: Its sound may not be impressive, but the G-Go's unique design, affordable price, and splash resistance make it appealing for casual listening. [Read more]

User Rating:
Good: The stylish Altec Lansing InAir 5000 streams immersive, consistent sound from iOS devices and iTunes over Apple's wireless AirPlay signal.
Bad: If you aren't terribly picky about sound quality, for half the cash you can get a Bluetooth speaker with nearly the same aural reach.
Bottom Line: The Altec Lansing InAir 5000 produces well-balanced sound in an attractive package that will blow the roof off your room...if you can afford it. [Read more]

User Rating:
Good:
Bad:
Bottom Line: Time will tell if Samsung's 55-inch ES9500 OLED TV lives up to its picture quality promise, but it is definitely thin. [Read more]

User Rating:
Good: The Xpand X104 YOUniversal 3D glasses are compatible with most 3D TVs made in the last few years, including 2011 and 2012 models that use Bluetooth if you add an optional RF dongle. Pairing them with your TV is fairly straightforward; when using Bluetooth they don't require line-of-sight. The battery is rechargeable, accessories are ample, and build quality is solid.
Bad: Xpand's glasses are somewhat expensive with the dongle. They're a bit heavier than compeditors and the fit isn't as comfortable as some.
Bottom Line: For the narrow niche of users who need active 3D glasses that work with most 3D TVs regardless of brand, the Xpand YOUniversals are great. For everyone else, they're overkill. [Read more]

User Rating:
Good: The Xpand X104 YOUniversal 3D glasses are compatible with most 3D TVs made in the last few years, including 2011 and 2012 models that use Bluetooth if you add an optional RF dongle. Pairing them with your TV is fairly straightforward; when using Bluetooth they don't require line-of-sight. The battery is rechargeable, accessories are ample, and build quality is solid.
Bad: Xpand's glasses are somewhat expensive with the dongle. They're a bit heavier than compeditors and the fit isn't as comfortable as some.
Bottom Line: For the narrow niche of users who need active 3D glasses that work with most 3D TVs regardless of brand, the Xpand YOUniversals are great. For everyone else, they're overkill. [Read more]

User Rating:
Good: The Xpand X104 YOUniversal 3D glasses are compatible with most 3D TVs made in the last few years, including 2011 and 2012 models that use Bluetooth if you add an optional RF dongle. Pairing them with your TV is fairly straightforward; when using Bluetooth they don't require line-of-sight. The battery is rechargeable, accessories are ample, and build quality is solid.
Bad: Xpand's glasses are somewhat expensive with the dongle. They're a bit heavier than compeditors and the fit isn't as comfortable as some.
Bottom Line: For the narrow niche of users who need active 3D glasses that work with most 3D TVs regardless of brand, the Xpand YOUniversals are great. For everyone else, they're overkill. [Read more]

User Rating:
Good: The Xpand X104 YOUniversal 3D glasses are compatible with most 3D TVs made in the last few years, including 2011 and 2012 models that use Bluetooth if you add an optional RF dongle. Pairing them with your TV is fairly straightforward; when using Bluetooth they don't require line-of-sight. The battery is rechargeable, accessories are ample, and build quality is solid.
Bad: Xpand's glasses are somewhat expensive with the dongle. They're a bit heavier than compeditors and the fit isn't as comfortable as some.
Bottom Line: For the narrow niche of users who need active 3D glasses that work with most 3D TVs regardless of brand, the Xpand YOUniversals are great. For everyone else, they're overkill. [Read more]

User Rating:
Good: The Xpand X104 YOUniversal 3D glasses are compatible with most 3D TVs made in the last few years, including 2011 and 2012 models that use Bluetooth if you add an optional RF dongle. Pairing them with your TV is fairly straightforward; when using Bluetooth they don't require line-of-sight. The battery is rechargeable, accessories are ample, and build quality is solid.
Bad: Xpand's glasses are somewhat expensive with the dongle. They're a bit heavier than compeditors and the fit isn't as comfortable as some.
Bottom Line: For the narrow niche of users who need active 3D glasses that work with most 3D TVs regardless of brand, the Xpand YOUniversals are great. For everyone else, they're overkill. [Read more]

User Rating:
Good: You see key Resident Evil events from a new perspective
Competitive play offers brief thrills

Bad: PC-specific interface and technical flaws
Fundamentally problematic cover system
Scarcity of ammo at odds with bullet-sponge enemies
Stupid AI
Sloppy details constantly get in the way of the fun

Bottom Line: Resident Evil: Raccoon City is a substandard port of a poor co-op shooter. [Read more]