User Rating:
Good: The Asus Memo Pad HD 7 rocks an impressively colorful screen, features a bevy of useful customization options, and comes in at a budget price.
Bad: Its performance is mediocre and the touch screen is sometimes unresponsive. The plastic build gives it a toy-like feel and it isn't very comfortable to hold. The dull design lacks panache.
Bottom Line: For those looking to save a buck, for its low price, the Asus Memo Pad HD 7 has a bevy of useful features, though there are better performing options out there. [Read more]

User Rating:
Good: The hand-assembled Falcon Northwest FragBox is highly customizable and aims for superior performance while keeping its physical footprint small.
Bad: The basic look of these smaller systems has changed little over the years, with few concessions made for newer developments, from Thunderbolt to Windows 8, and no matter what configuration you put together, it's going to be expensive.
Bottom Line: High-end, high-price gaming desktops are an even rarer beast than ever, but with the latest Intel and Nvidia parts inside, at least the significant money you'll put into a Falcon Northwest FragBox will be well-spent. [Read more]

User Rating:
Good: Thanks to the company's X-Trans sensor and good JPEG processing, the Fujifilm X-M1 delivers some of the best image quality we've seen for less than $1,000. The camera's also well designed and attractive.
Bad: Poor video quality and a subpar Wi-Fi implementation prove annoying drawbacks.
Bottom Line: While it may not be the best overall camera available for less than $1,000, the Fujifilm X-M1 does deliver the best photo quality in its price class. [Read more]

User Rating:
Good: Thanks to the company's X-Trans sensor and good JPEG processing, the Fujifilm X-M1 delivers some of the best image quality we've seen for less than $1,000. The camera's also well designed and attractive.
Bad: Poor video quality and a subpar Wi-Fi implementation prove annoying drawbacks.
Bottom Line: While it may not be the best overall camera available for less than $1,000, the Fujifilm X-M1 does deliver the best photo quality in its price class. [Read more]

User Rating:
Good: Thanks to the company's X-Trans sensor and good JPEG processing, the Fujifilm X-M1 delivers some of the best image quality we've seen for less than $1,000. The camera's also well designed and attractive.
Bad: Poor video quality and a subpar Wi-Fi implementation prove annoying drawbacks.
Bottom Line: While it may not be the best overall camera available for less than $1,000, the Fujifilm X-M1 does deliver the best photo quality in its price class. [Read more]

User Rating:
Good: Thanks to the company's X-Trans sensor and good JPEG processing, the Fujifilm X-M1 delivers some of the best image quality we've seen for less than $1,000. The camera's also well designed and attractive.
Bad: Poor video quality and a subpar Wi-Fi implementation prove annoying drawbacks.
Bottom Line: While it may not be the best overall camera available for less than $1,000, the Fujifilm X-M1 does deliver the best photo quality in its price class. [Read more]

User Rating:
Good: Thanks to the company's X-Trans sensor and good JPEG processing, the Fujifilm X-M1 delivers some of the best image quality we've seen for less than $1,000. The camera's also well designed and attractive.
Bad: Poor video quality and a subpar Wi-Fi implementation prove annoying drawbacks.
Bottom Line: While it may not be the best overall camera available for less than $1,000, the Fujifilm X-M1 does deliver the best photo quality in its price class. [Read more]

User Rating:
Good: Thanks to the company's X-Trans sensor and good JPEG processing, the Fujifilm X-M1 delivers some of the best image quality we've seen for less than $1,000. The camera's also well designed and attractive.
Bad: Poor video quality and a subpar Wi-Fi implementation prove annoying drawbacks.
Bottom Line: While it may not be the best overall camera available for less than $1,000, the Fujifilm X-M1 does deliver the best photo quality in its price class. [Read more]