Right on the heels of last month's Video Connect app release for iPhone, Qik today announces Video Connect for Android. So what does this analogous pair of apps mean in the grand scheme of mobile communications? It means another big step in the way of ubiquitous, cross-platform video phone calls. Adding the ability to initiate video calls between Android and iOS devices over 3G, 4G, Wi-Fi, and WiMax networks is sure to bring the already popular app tons of new users.

In addition to its primary video calling feature, the app offers integrated sharing across social media (Facebook, Twitter, or YouTube) and video mail for when friends aren't available for live chat. Note that the video mail feature is available as a free trial only until June 1 this year, after which it will be available for an extra fee.

Qik also claims the app comes with "improved battery life, smoother video, [and] better picture quality through deep device and hardware integration in collaboration with handset manufacturers," which is all good news if true.

Just update your preloaded Qik app, or find Qik Video Connect in the Android app store for instant download. Interested parties should act fast though, as the app is available for free only this week. After, it will jump to $2.99.

Some of us with a bunch of photos on an iPad would rather add keywords and captions than slap on yet another sepia-tone art filter. Enter C Squared Enterprises' Photosmith.

This $17.99 app, released today, is a companion to Adobe Systems' Lightroom software for editing and cataloging photos. I've been trying beta versions, and I think the app could be a useful addition for some photographers--especially if the software and the iPad's abilities continue to grow beyond today's limitations.

Photosmith can't match what Lightroom proper can do, of course--the iPad's memory, keyboard, and processor power can't keep up with a personal computer's hardware. But it can be a useful supplement for those who don't have a computer handy.

Think of Photosmith's purpose as a variation on the adage that the best camera is the one you have with you, except with the computers you use to handle photos. Tablets are light enough that some number of people will carry them when they wouldn't carry a laptop. So, just like your camera phone will take better shots than your SLR that you left at home, Photosmith will do a better job managing your photos than your laptop that's too much of a pain to lug around.

The app lets you add keywords (aka tags), captions, titles, color coding, and star ratings to photos. It lets you zoom to a full 100 percent--much better than the iPad's built-in Photos app when it comes to checking focus--and to see exposure information such as shutter speed. It lets you organize photos into catalogs. And, using a plug-in for Lightroom, lets you sync the photos over a Wi-Fi network with your photo catalog.

If I had my regular computer around, I probably wouldn't put my photos through a time-consuming iPad/Photosmith detour. But if you're traveling, it could be a great way to store, evaluate, organize, and share shots as long as you don't need more storage than a 64GB iPad 2.

I found it pretty useful for plowing through several dozen photos while I was on a plane trip. When I got back I set up the sync system and--very slowly--transferred the photos to my PC. I could see it as very useful when traveling light for a week or two.

Photography is getting more serious on iPads, and I imagine Android tablets will follow at least to some extent later. So far I'm not convinced a tablet is essential, but it's definitely getting useful.

Some other examples of serious, if not essential, tablet apps:

• LightTrac helps photographers figure out where and when to be for those sunset or moonrise shots.

• Adobe's Nav app lets people use an iPad to pilot Photoshop over Wi-Fi, selecting tools and moving among images.

• LRpad lets people use an iPad as a Lightroom external control panel, connected over Wi-Fi..

Photosmith in action
First, you have to get some photos on the iPad. You can take your own, of course, with the iPad 2's lame but still usable camera, but the kind of people who use Lightroom tend to be those who like to shoot raw photos--the uncompressed, unprocessed, high-quality images from digital SLRs and other higher-end cameras. Happily, the iPad can handle many raw formats, useful plumbing for Photosmith.

To transfer shots onto the iPad, I used Apple's $29 Camera Connection Kit. Apple's software ingests the photos. When you run Photosmith, it does a little pre-processing work that didn't take long on my iPad 2, then you're ready to go.

There are three modes. A library and loupe view mimic similar modes in Lightroom, the first for organizing and the second for adding keywords and captions. A third full-screen mode comes with lightweight controls for color coding, star ratings, and the single most frustrating feature about Photosmith, the reject flag.

One of the most natural things I wanted to do with Photosmith was winnow out the dud shots, especially with the real 100-percent zoom ability. Photosmith lets you mark a photo as a reject, but because of "technical limitations," that's all you can do. No deleting the original, and no ability to see in the iPad Photos app which shots you've marked as duds. Happily, though, rejected shots aren't synced with Lightroom.

I had a couple of stability problems with Photosmith, but I was often using betas. A more persistent problem up through the currently shipping v.1.0.2 came when zooming to 100 percent: sometimes the app would constantly re-render all or a portion of the view. Zooming back out and in generally seemed to fix the problem.

Another gripe: Although you can save keywords for later use, automating their use somewhat, I wanted to apply keywords, titles, and captions to large groups of photos.

The sync process took a long time over Wi-Fi with my Canon 5D Mark II's 30MB, 21-megapixel raw files, and it's hobbled by the iPad's weak multitasking that halts the process unless it's the active app.

There's a faster way to it though--connect the iPad with USB, import the photos with Lightroom, then afterward run the sync plug-in to fetch the missing metadata. A bit kludgy, but a lot speedier in the end, as long as you don't have too many duds that you don't want to import at all.

The user interface is generally well thought out and should be pretty easy for Lightroom fans to grok. When I was selecting lots of photos (using a very convenient two-finger tap) I sometimes had performance issues while scrolling or while dragging groups of photos to collections.

The app also lets you share images via Facebook, Flickr, Dropbox, and e-mail..

Photosmith's future
Overall, the app is useful if limited. I see more potential, though, when it comes to editing.

The beauty of editing photos with Lightroom (and Apple's rival, Aperture) is that the original images are unchanged and edits are stored in accompanying metadata. That means an app like Photosmith could gradually add new editing features that would store changes as metadata that takes up almost no extra storage space. (The approach also is nondestructive, which means edits are more easily reversed.)

Obvious candidates for editing features are the global changes--cropping, rotating, shadow fill, highlight recovery, saturation, contrast, white balance adjustment. Many of these could be operated with a slider interface that's conveniently similar to what Lightroom already offers. The big challenge will be processing power, though.

This leads me into a comment about pricing. At 18 bucks, most people will let this pass them by. But Lightroom users (who pay $260 or so for the privilege) tend to be more dedicated. For them, $18 could be worthwhile--especially if Photosmith extends into the editing realm.

And it might well do so.

"An app like this is just begging for image editing, including full sync to Lightroom," tease developers Chris Horne and Chris Morse on their Photosmith tour page. "Future release maybe? Time will tell..."

Originally posted at Deep Tech

ZoneAlarm SocialGuard (download) from Check Point Software Technologies is a Windows program released today that allows parents to monitor children's Facebook activities to see if they're bullying, being bullied, friending strangers, or engaging in potentially dangerous online activities.

No stealth mode
For parents to monitor their kid's profile, the child has to sign in once with his or her Facebook user name and password. That password is not passed on to the parent and the parent can't actually see the child's profile or what they're posting. Instead they get alerts of anything that the software considers to be suspicious. Requiring that the child or teen agree to be monitored not only protects the child's privacy but helps encourage conversations between the parent and the child, according to Bari Abdul, vice president of consumer sales at Check Point and a parent of three children.

With this program, the parents can monitor their kids without having to friend their kids. Some kids find it embarrassing to have a parent show up on their friends list.

Triggers
The program analyzes all friends to see if any appear to be "socially separated," which means that there are few if any mutual friends. It also looks at each friend's profile to try to determine if the person may be lying about his or her age.

The program also looks for certain words that might be associated with bullying or dangerous activity and if it repeatedly encounters words or links associated with sex, drugs, alcohol, suicide, gambling, hacking, hate speech, violence and other threats, it sends out a warning to parents. Parents can add their own words to watch out for certain types of ethnic or sexual slurs or anything else that they're concerned about. Parents can also enter their child's phone number and address to be notified if they show up in posts.

Underage Facebook users
In a podcast interview, Abdul (scroll down to listen) said that he and his spouse "struggle with how to manage the independence that we give to them and at the same time monitor their social media habits." Abdul acknowledged that part of the market for the product are parents of children under the age of 13 who, according to Facebook's terms of service, are not allowed to be on the service.

Separate studies in both the U.S. and Europe have shown that a substantial number of kids under 13 are among the more than 500 million Facebook users. A 2010 study commissioned by McAfee found that 37 percent of U.S. 10- to 12 year-olds were on Facebook and the recently released EU Kids Online study found that 38 percent of European 9- to 12-year-olds "use social networking sites with one in five having a profile on Facebook." The authors of that European study called age restrictions "not effective."

Listen now: Download today's podcast
Subscribe now: iTunes (audio) | RSS (audio)

Originally posted at Safe and Secure